Systolic Function: Difference between revisions

Systolic Function (view source)

Revision as of 10:05, 17 November 2013

2,291 bytes added , 17 November 2013

no edit summary

Nilofer

0

edits

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ==Left ventricular systolic function==
 ===Left ventricular function===
 {| class="wikitable" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="700px"
 |-
@@ Line 25: / Line 26: @@
 |-
 |Wallmotion score index
-|1.0
+|align="center"|1.0
-|1.0-1.5
+|align="center"|1.0-1.5
-|1.5-2.0
+|align="center"|1.5-2.0
-|<2.0
+|align="center"|<2.0
-|1.0
+|align="center"|1.0
-|1.0-1.5
+|align="center"|1.0-1.5
-|1.5-2.0
+|align="center"|1.5-2.0
-|<2.0
+|align="center"|<2.0
 |-
 |Endocardial fractional shortening, %
-|27-45
+|align="center"|27-45
-|22-26
+|align="center"|22-26
-|17-21
+|align="center"|17-21
-|≤16
+|align="center"|≤16
-|25-43
+|align="center"|25-43
-|20-24
+|align="center"|20-24
-|15-19
+|align="center"|15-19
-|≤14
+|align="center"|≤14
 |-
 |Midwall fractional shortening, %
-|15-23
+|align="center"|15-23
-|13-14
+|align="center"|13-14
-|11-12
+|align="center"|11-12
-|≤10
+|align="center"|≤10
-|14-22
+|align="center"|14-22
-|12-13
+|align="center"|12-13
-|10-11
+|align="center"|10-11
-|≤10
+|align="center"|≤10
 |-
 |colspan="9"|'''2D Method'''
@@ Line 69: / Line 70: @@
 |-
 |Myocard performance index
-|<0.40
+|align="center"|<0.40
 |
 |
 |
-|<0.40
+|align="center"|<0.40
 |
 |
@@ Line 79: / Line 80: @@
 |-
 |dP/dt
-|>1100
+|align="center"|>1100
 |
 |
-|<500
+|align="center"|<500
-|>1100
+|align="center"|>1100
 |
 |
-|<500
+|align="center"|<500
 |-
 |colspan="9"|'''Bold values:''' Recommended and best validated.<cite>1</cite>
@@ Line 96: / Line 97: @@
 ===Left ventricular function by Strain Rate Imaging===
+{| class="wikitable" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="700px"
+|-
+!colspan="6"|Comparison of segmental Values (mean and SD) for LV strain (TQ<3), with a repeated measures design
+|-
+!
+!All Levels
+!Apical
+!Mid
+!Basal
+!pValue (Levels)
+|-
+|All Walls
+|align="center"| -18.6±5.1
+|align="center"| -20.2±5.6
+|align="center"| -18.7±3.3
+|align="center"| -17.0±5.2
+|align="center"|<0.0001
+|-
+|Anterior
+|align="center"| -19.5±4.2
+|align="center"| -19.4±5.4
+|align="center"| -18.8±3.4
+|align="center"| -20.1±4.0
+|align="center"|0.001
+|-
+|Anteroseptal
+|align="center"| -18.8±4.2
+|align="center"| -18.8±5.9
+|align="center"| -19.4±3.2
+|align="center"| -18.3±3.5
+|align="center"|0.001
+|-
+|Inferior
+|align="center"| -20.0±4.5*
+|align="center"| -22.5±4.5
+|align="center"| -20.4±3.5
+|align="center"| -17.1±3.9
+|align="center"|<0.0001
+|-
+|Lateral
+|align="center"| -18.3±4.7
+|align="center"| -19.2±5.4
+|align="center"| -18.1±3.5
+|align="center"| -17.3±5.0
+|align="center"|0.06
+|-
+|Posterior
+|align="center"| -16.3±6.3†
+|align="center"| -17.7±6.0
+|align="center"| -16.8±5.0
+|align="center"| -14.5±7.4
+|align="center"|<0.0001
+|-
+|Septal
+|align="center"| -18.3±5.3
+|align="center"| -22.3±4.8
+|align="center"| -18.7±3.0
+|align="center"| -13.7±4.0
+|align="center"|<0.0001
+|-
+|p (walls)
+|align="center"|<0.0001
+|align="center"|<0.0001
+|align="center"|<0.0001
+|align="center"|<0.0001
+|-
+|colspan="6"|*inferior was significantly different from other walls (p<0.001 except anterior p+0.002), in the comparison of walls at all levels.†Posterior was significantly different from all other walls (p<0.0001). In the comparison oflevels in all walls, each level was significantly different (p <0.0001). LV=left ventricular, TQ=tracking quality.<cite>2</cite>
+|}
 ==References==