Mitral Insufficiency: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Mitral Insufficiency (view source)

Revision as of 09:16, 29 March 2014

1 byte removed , 29 March 2014

→‎Carpentier classification

April

0

edits

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 |<4cm<sup>2</sup>
 |4cm-10cm<sup>2</sup>
-|10cm<sup>2</sup
+|10cm<sup>2</sup>
 |-
 !ERO
 |<20 mm<sup>2</sup>
 |20-40mm<sup>2</sup>
-|40mm<sup>2</sup
+|40mm<sup>2</sup>
 |-
 !Vena contracta
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 ==Assess the severity of mitral insufficiency==
-An independent measure seem to be that the regurgitant area trying to access parameters. With the help of the Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA) method, the effective regurgiterend orificium (ERO) can be calculated. The vena contracta (narrowest part of regurgitant jet) has a strong relationship with the regurgitant orificium.
+An independent measure seem to be that the regurgitant area trying to access parameters. With the help of the Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA) method, the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) can be calculated. The vena contracta (narrowest part of regurgitant jet) has a strong relationship with the regurgitant orificium.
-Of course, it should not be forgotten. "Old" values in the estimation of the seriousness of the MI In a severe MI will, after all, often the left atrium will be enlarged and the PW measured with E / A ratio of the mitraalinflow >>1 should be, and the velocity E> 1.5 to 1.8 m/s.
+Of course, it should not be forgotten. "Old" values in the estimation of the seriousness of the MI In a severe MI will, after all, often the left atrium will be enlarged and the PW measured with E / A ratio of the mitraal inflow >>1 should be, and the velocity E> 1.5 to 1.8 m/s.
 {| class="wikitable" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"
 |-
-!colspan="3"|[[Image:PISA.jpg|500px]]
+!colspan="3"|[[Image:PISA.svg|500px]]
 |-
 !colspan="3" align="center"|Criteria For MR severity<nowiki>*</nowiki>
@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 {| class="wikitable" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="750px"
 |-
-|bgcolor="#FFFFFF" align="center" colspan="3"|[[Image:Carpentier1.png|600px]]
+|bgcolor="#FFFFFF" align="center" colspan="3"|[[Image:Carpentier1.svg|600px]]
 |-
-|width="250px" valign="top"|'''Type I:''' Normal mobility of the leaflets, cleft mitral valve hole in mitral valve endocarditis by
+|width="250px" valign="top"|'''Type I:''' Normal mobility of the leaflets, cleft mitral valve hole in mitral valve endocarditis by functional with annulus dilatation
-functional with annulus dilatation
+|width="250px" valign="top"|'''Type II:''' Excessive movement of the leaflets, mitral valve prolapse notochord elongation, notochord / papillary muscle rupture
-|width="250px" valign="top"|'''Type II:''' Excessive movement of the leaflets, mitral valve prolapse
-notochord elongation, notochord / papillary muscle rupture
 |width="250px" valign="top"|'''Type III:''' Restrictive mobility of the leaflets, attached the leaflets do not open fully in diastole. Lime in annulus overgrijpend on blade such as hypertension, HCM, AoS. Fusion of commissures as in acute rheumatism, parachute mitral valve. Merger or retraction of subvalvular apparatus.
 |}
@@ Line 80: / Line 78: @@
 {| class="wikitable" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"
 |-
-|bgcolor="#FFFFFF" align="center"|[[Image:Carpentier2.png|400px]]
+|bgcolor="#FFFFFF" align="center"|[[Image:Carpentier2.svg|400px]]
 |-
 |